<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:30:16 +0100
Walter Ian Kaye said: > What exactly do you mean by close monitoring of mailing lists? Do you > mean that you'll have dedicated staff for reading every obscure > mailing list on the planet? And how does he deal with the fact that such action is a criminal offence in this country? >>>> Yesterday, in excess of 500 ISPs were contacted and informed about the >>>> system. The response has been unbelievable to say the least with 90% >>>> reporting immediatly that they would adopt such a system. > 90% positive response? You haven't even gotten that here; more like > the reverse. Perhaps you were just very vague in your "contact" so > the ISP representatives did not fully grasp the implications and only > responded in a "wishful" sense Which ISPs did you - Mark - contact in the UK? I'm surprised that the entire UK anti-spam community seems to be silent on this for such an "unbelievable" response rate. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: clive@localhost | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: clive@localhost | *** NOTE CHANGE *** Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
- From: Nick Hilliard
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
- References:
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
- From: Mark McCarron
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
- From: Walter Ian Kaye
- Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Solution to Spam
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |