Re: [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact

• To: (Florian Weimer)
• From: Sebastian Willing < >
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:40:20 +0100 (CET)
• Reply-to:

Hallo!

Florian Weimer wrote:
> 
> Sabri Berisha sabri@localhost writes:
> 
> > Perhaps you'd be better of adding this to the IRT objects?
> >
> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-254.html
> 
> Isn't the IRT object dead?

I never saw one :)

> 
> Personally, I think it's more important to require functional (!)
> email (!) contacts for inetnum objects (and allocate the necessary
> manpower to be able to investigate reports of broken addresses)).
> 
> Of course, this is whishful thinking because no one is going to pay
> for the work involved.

Many ISPs have abuse contacts. For those customers who don't have any
(or where the customers themself are spamming), I suggested to make the abuse
contact mandatory for allocations (= added by the hostmasters).

MfG / Regards,
S.Willing

************************************************************************
M / W / S  			Sebastian Willing
http://www.mops.net		Technical director
Telefon: 01803/684310578	e-Mail: s.willing@localhost
Telefax: 01805/445169111	SW88-RIPE
************************************************************************

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • [anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact
    • From: Florian Weimer