Re: Commecial vs fairness (was: spam support)

• To: "Mally Mclane" < >
  "Anne Marcel Roorda" < >
• From: "Gert-Jan" < >
• Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:39:47 +0100
• Reply-to: "Gert-Jan" < >

And do not forget, a lot of info from the NCC is public!!!

Gert-Jan Obels


----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Mally Mclane mally@localhost
Aan: Anne Marcel Roorda marcel@localhost
Verzonden: zaterdag 16 februari 2002 23:09
Onderwerp: Re: Commecial vs fairness (was: spam support)


>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Anne Marcel Roorda wrote:
>
> >
> > In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0202161652460.32320-100000@localhost>,
Mally
> > Mclane writes:
> >
> > > >   An announcement from the NCC upon return of a IP range would fix
that.
> > > > Anyone running a blacklist would then have the entire hold period to
> > > > remove any listings from that range.
> > >
> > > the ncc doesnt see all that much space returned. If a company goes
bust or
> > > somesuch, their assets are usually bought out by another company.
> >
> >   True, but that doesn't mean anything.
>
> ?
>
> If address space isnt coming back, how/why would the NCC send out an
> announcement about it?
>
>
> m
>

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: Commecial vs fairness (was: spam support)
    • From: Mally Mclane