You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > Mailman Archives
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Commecial vs fairness (was: spam support)

  • To: < >
  • From: Paul Wouters < >
  • Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:49:13 +0100 (MET)
  • Cc: "anti-spam-wg@localhost" < >

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 variable@localhost wrote:

> Exactly.  I can't think of any organisation I'd trust more to run a
> blacklist than RIPE.

RIPE NCC should do IP allocation things. RIPE as a community should write
up proposals and guidelines it believes are good, and should not enfoce
those. The last thing you want any of the two to do is keep blacklists
related to spam. Unless you want them to hire a truckload of lawyers, and
your contribution to sky rocket.

Leave spam to the various legal bodies to fix, and then let the AUP's handle
the rest. Or block thing son an individual or at least informal basis.

Paul Wouters
Xtended Internet
Broerdijk 27			Postbus 170		Tel: 31-24-360 39 19	
6523 GM Nijmegen		6500 AD Nijmegen	Fax: 31-24-360 19 99
The Netherlands			The Netherlands		info@localhost

  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>