Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce

• To: Ulf Vedenbrant < >
• From: Piet Beertema < >
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:29:56 +0100

    Perhaps that UCE is required by law to have a specific
    sender domain or user tag...
    That could then easily be rejected in the SMTP dialogue.
A tag that could be used in the SMTP dialogue would be
a very good means to stop spam at the source. Or for
that matter, at open relays.
However, it ain't that easy: see my previous replies
about "legal spam" and "accepted UCE".

    For example
    
    uce-spam-uce should be added to the sending address
    <[email protected]
Unlikely. That would cause zillions of problems.
    
    or a new top level domain... .spam or .uce
    [email protected]
Possible. Routing might be a problem though.


	Piet

• Post To The List:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce
    • From: Ragnar Lonn

• References:
  • Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce
    • From: Ulf Vedenbrant