[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Nov 29 10:01:56 CET 2023
Hi, On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:39:28AM +0100, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > 2017-02 doesn???t enforce people really using the abuse-c, Neither does your proposal to require verification... all it does is require "if a mail from the NCC comes in, click on the confirmation button". People not interested in abuse handling will not magically become interested by having a regular check whether the mailbox is working - actually, to the contrary, if the abuse mailbox bounces, you know right away that they are not interested. *Should* they be? Of course! Will your proposal magically achieve that? no. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231129/f3107105/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]