[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Linford
linford at spamhaus.org
Thu Nov 2 22:48:08 CET 2023
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 13:56, John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote: > > It appears that à ngel Gonzalez Berdasco via anti-abuse-wg <angel.gonzalez at incibe.es> said: >>> Just block their network 80.94.95.0/24 and forget about it. > >> organisation: ORG-BA1515-RIPE >> org-name: BtHoster LTD >> country: GB >> org-type: OTHER >> address: 26, New Kent Road, London, SE1 6TJ, UNITED KINGDOM > > If you look at that address on Google stret view, you will see a late > 2022 picture of a construction site. > > Unless you care enough to contact their transit providers and try > and get them disconnected, I wouldn't waste more time on it. > > R's, > John > Interesting. The same company director “Colin Brown” registered another company just a few days ago at that same 26 New Kent Road address: “Emanuel Hosting Ltd”. I wonder how long before Emanuel pops up on abuse radar. (Bit of a problem with UK companies; cheap and quick to register + penalty for not filing any accounts is that a year or two they simply get struck off the Companies Register. Perfect for Fly-by-Night companies.) Best regards, Steve ___________________ Steve Linford Spamhaus Project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]