[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacking and Blocking of Business Users Profiles on Meta Platforms
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacking and Blocking of Business Users Profiles on Meta Platforms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at interall.co.il
Fri Feb 17 14:06:38 CET 2023
On 17/02/2023 13:32, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: Sure. From: https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/active-wg/anti-abuse "While areas such as hosting illegal content or copyright infringement are not seen as a central part of the working group's remit, they are unquestionably bound up in other aspects of network abuse and, as such, may be areas of interest." Regards, Hank > Hank > > I’m a little confused. > > This is the RIPE anti-abuse WG. > > I don’t see how this issue is related to this group. > > Could you please explain? > > Thanks and regards > > Michele > > -- > > Mr Michele Neylon > > Blacknight Solutions > > Hosting, Colocation & Domains > > https://www.blacknight.com/ <https://www.blacknight.com/> > > https://blacknight.blog/ <https://blacknight.blog/> > > Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ <https://michele.blog/> > > Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ <https://ceo.hosting/> > > ------------------------------- > > Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business > Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 > > I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not > expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours. > > *From: *anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Hank > Nussbacher <hank at interall.co.il> > *Date: *Friday, 17 February 2023 at 09:23 > *To: *anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > *Subject: *[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacking and Blocking of Business Users > Profiles on Meta Platforms > > *[EXTERNAL EMAIL]*Please use caution when opening attachments from > unrecognised sources. > > Hijacking and Blocking of Business Users Profiles on Meta Platforms > > https://en.isoc.org.il/netica/hijacking-and-blocking-of-business-users-profiles-on-meta-platforms <https://en.isoc.org.il/netica/hijacking-and-blocking-of-business-users-profiles-on-meta-platforms> > > ISOC-IL wishes to raise the issue that Meta is not taking sufficient > actions to curtail hijacking of business profiles. In the attached > paper ISOC-IL shows countless examples (actually 170 cases in the past > year) of targeted attacks that are designed to block and hijack specific > business accounts. These customers are paying customers yet due to > Facebook's automatic blocking of planted pedophilia or terrorist videos, > these customers have no recourse to even open a complaint with Meta. > Paying customers should not have to threaten legal action for the issue > to be dealt with. > > Meta must develop tools that can distinguish between systematic, > deliberate publication of offensive and destructive content, and the > publication of damaging content on hijacked, innocent profiles for the > purpose of blocking those profiles. Meta needs to establish customer > service that responds to business account owners wronged by hacking and > fraud. > > Regards, > Hank >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacking and Blocking of Business Users Profiles on Meta Platforms
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]