[anti-abuse-wg] What todo when a registrar doe snot respond to babuse form an IP
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What todo when a registrar doe snot respond to babuse form an IP
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2022-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at interall.co.il
Thu Jun 23 11:30:56 CEST 2022
On 23/06/2022 10:24, Jeroen Massar via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > > Use block lists like https://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/ to make your life a bit easier; but, do not outright block, use them ala Spamassassin as one of many inputs to rank if an IP is likely to be good or bad. > > For Tor, there is https://check.torproject.org/api/bulk ; though in the end Tor is just noise; compromised hosts are a bigger issue. > For Internet, there is a very harsh: https://www.spamhaus.org/drop/ (you might also accidentally possibly block good people using those ISPs) > > Whatever list you use, be it those from Spamhaus or other providers, do verify what you block and maybe whitelist what you never want to block. > Making a baseline of "normal clients" can also be useful: eg, no sense in processing packets from a IP in Antartica when you normally do not get traffic from there. Your Network, Your Policy... but also your pain when a user gets accidentally blocked... If you raised the issue, what do others think of https://www.crowdsec.net/ Thanks, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] What todo when a registrar doe snot respond to babuse form an IP
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2022-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]