[anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Mon Jun 20 12:48:22 CEST 2022
Hi, The RIPE NCC Service Region spans over 70+ economies. In fact it spans over the whole planet when someone from outside the service region details some plans to use IP addresses mostly within the service region -- is this verified some time after the resources are allocated? So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws of ONE of EU's member countries. Regards, Carlos On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Just a brief point. I previously noted here that RIPE's rules requiring > unanimity or near unanimity in order to declare "consensus" with respect > to any given proposal has recently been recognized, by some EU politicians > at least, as being a material impediment to forward movement on various > issues. > > I only just noted that this growing sentiment has now apparently extended > even to the Chancellor of Germany: > > https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1538637496124317704 > > My hope, of course, is that RIPE and its various WGs are taking notes. > > > Regards, > rfg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]