[anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Jul 23 20:24:53 CEST 2022
Hello, I see it as useful. Not all CSIRTs are "purely virtual teams". We do have headquarters and hence a postal address. I would say the majority of established CSIRTs has a postal address. I don't have a strong opinion if the postal address should be mandatory or optional, though. A letter (sent by post) might reach different people that might then call the attention of other folks that didn't read or reply to an e-mail message... Cheers, Carlos On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Alexander Talos-Zens wrote: > Hej, > > >> usefulness (or not) of a mandatory postal address in the IRT object. > > If I can't reach someone by electronic media, I doubt I'd get better > response to snail mail. Furthermore, purely virtual teams might not > have a true physical location at all. > > Cheers, > > Alexander Talos-Zens > > -- > Alexander Talos-Zens > IT-Security - ACOnet-CERT > Zentraler Informatikdienst > https://zid.univie.ac.at > > > Universität Wien > Universitätsstraße 7 > 1010 Wien > T +43-1-4277-14351 > at at univie.ac.at > GPG-Key-Id: 0x757A494B > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]