[anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kristijonas Lukas Bukauskas
ripe at n0.lt
Tue Mar 2 14:36:37 CET 2021
On 2021-03-02 13:12, Esa Laitinen wrote: > Now, if RIPE should boycott UCEPROTECT because of this faux pass is > something we could discuss. I'd rather have someone contacting > UCEPROTECT team and get an attitude adjustment in place, but that's me. Is there a way to contact them that anybody is aware of? On their website (http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=2&s=0; Q17), they say: > A17: Spammers are criminal gangs. In 2004 and since, many other > blacklists stopped after they were threatened or attacked. > We also got a package from Ukraine with a dead rat inside and a > message: "You are next!" > For security reasons we moved to a new location and have chosen to > continue our war against spammers. > Art 34 Abs 5 BayMeldeG (Bavarian Law) grants that only national > authorities can find out about us. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210302/e2b88a0a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]