[anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sun Feb 21 20:19:07 CET 2021
Hi, There seems to be at least one rule common to everyone: if you want to run a network with an independent routing policy you'll need to use BGP. Unfortunately it seems dealing with abuse emerging from the networks one runs is not a common, basic, rule for everyone. Also, network admins should stick to run networks, and not try to handle abuse by themselves. But a lot of networks don't have anyone to do that (or have a business model in which all abuse reports are discarded by default), hence the chaos. Regards, Carlos On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Randy Bush wrote: > there is a fair bit of spectrum between the internet of cooperating > competitors running their networks as prudently as they can afford > and an internet desired by some where everything is done uniformly > by rigid written rules. > > what i find interesting is that a number of the folk here who > loudly espouse the latter don't actually run networks. > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]