[anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
steve payne
stevenp8844 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 16:48:53 CET 2021
The problem with the online form report abuse is that you can only submit 1 url at a time. When you submit the url, then they will ask for more information. The same as sending to abuse@ Once you submit the additional information, you usually do not hear anything back from these cloud hosting providers and I rarely see anything happen. The "abuse" they are looking for is email spam generated from their servers that do not follow the CAN-SPAM act. Any other type of "abuse" is not "abuse" as the usual response is "Oh I found what your're talking about i've fixed the problem". On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:02 PM JJS JJS <no0484985 at gmail.com> wrote: > To put it alternatively: > > Imagine you walk down a street and there are lots of pubs (saloons?) that > serve Alcohol and they all have drunken people swearing and trashing the > place and you ask to report it to the manager but the bouncer of one > premises says... "You have to put it in writing via email" and the next > premises says "you have to telephone during business hours" and another > says "you have to write a letter to an address". > > > That is their choice. Sometimes with forms, it pre-loads it into a system > that formats it for them. Sometimes there are email systems that can > extract that information and format it anyway. But if they want you to use > a form, they are indicating that's the best way for them to know what is > happening. > > > > > On 21/02/2021 2:38 pm, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > I get an email spam so I report it... via email. > > I *do not * don snorkle gear. I do not contort my body into odd > shapes. I do not make my report out-of-band, via smoke signals, > or morse code, or via modulated infrared wavelengths. > > Call me old fashioned, but as I have already made plain, I do not think > that I should be required to do any of these things. It is easier for > me just to block all of Hostdime, which I had plenty of reasons to > do already anyway. > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. Seriously, how much arrogance does it take for them to say to > me that it is OK for me to have taken up *my* time to have read the > crap that was originated by *their* customer, but *they* cannot be > bothered to read *my* mail to them? > > > > ------- Forwarded Message > > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:47:33 -0500 > From: abuse at hostdime.com <abuse at hostdime.com> > To: rfg at tristatelogic.com > Subject: [AUTOREPLY] - Please submit complaint to https://www.hostdime.com/abus > e-report/ > > Hello, > > Thank you for contacting HostDime. > > Please resubmit your original message at the following link for action to be co > nsidered: > - ------------------- > HostDime Abuse Report Formhttps://www.hostdime.com/abuse-report/ > - ------------------- > Thank you, > HostDime.com, Inc > > NOTE: This is an automated message. Please do not reply to this email. This mai > lbox is not monitored. > > ------- End of Forwarded Message > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210221/9643e824/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Anti-social assholes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]