[anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] REPORT: DDoS-Guard - AS57724, AS262254, AS49612
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Thu Feb 18 13:40:03 CET 2021
Hi aa-wg, For some context, today and yesterday I have been receiving spam in the form of fake abuse notices to my abuse contact email address. Is there a generally accepted standard for when it's okay to block an address or a prefix from emailing your abuse contact? I consider being able to contact the abuse email address of a network a rather important function, so I prefer not to block it. But also as I have more relaxed spam filters for the abuse contact to make sure nothing gets lost, it feels like blocking the address/prefix is my only option other than manually filtering through these emails (10 so far in total, today and yesterday). So back to the question, is there a generally accepted point at which blocking an address/prefix is fine? Thanks, -Cynthia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210218/7c2c2850/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] REPORT: DDoS-Guard - AS57724, AS262254, AS49612
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]