[anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Wed Sep 9 08:52:32 CEST 2020
On Tue 08/Sep/2020 16:33:20 +0200 Alex de Joode wrote: > A webform, for a regulator, most likely will be seen as an 'upgrade'. Note that > FB and Google also *only accept* complaints, notices etc via webforms. So one > can argue a webform is [email protected] 2.0 :) So I do not share you view that a webform > is a second rate instrument for accepting abuse notifications. > IME that's not true. I notice Google's auto-responses. Perhaps, I should set up a web form myself for receiving such replies...? Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Report & Co-Chair's Decision on Proposal 2019-04
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]