[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JJS JJS
no0484985 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 9 03:37:47 CEST 2020
I disagree that it did not reach consensus. There was never any proper measure of whether it reached consensus. --- On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:48 AM Petrit Hasani <phasani at ripe.net> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > The policy proposal 2019-04, "Validation of "abuse-mailbox”” has been > withdrawn. > > The proposal aimed to have the RIPE NCC validate "abuse-c:” information > more often and introduce a new validation process. > > The proposal is archived and can be found at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/archived-policy-proposals/archive-policy-proposals/ > > Reason for withdrawal: > The proposal did not reach consensus and the WG chairs did not feel that > any further redrafting of the proposal would achieve consensus. > > Kind regards, > -- > Petrit Hasani > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200909/4392ff87/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]