[anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Final-ish Call for Agenda Items: AA-WG @ RIPE81
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Mon Oct 26 19:30:14 CET 2020
On Mon 26/Oct/2020 15:33:21 +0100 Alex de Joode wrote: > Jordi et al, > > I have to comment RIPE NCC and WGCC (and those that recused themselves). The > appeals process was used, the outcome reaffirmed the original decision. > > It's clear the proposal was fatally flawed. > > May I suggest we do not waist extra effort on this but accept the outcome and > instead of looking back, regroup and look forward? +1, there is more than just trying to rebuke non-compliant ISPs. Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Final-ish Call for Agenda Items: AA-WG @ RIPE81
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]