[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
PP
phishphucker at storey.ovh
Tue Oct 6 01:54:19 CEST 2020
Which then allows you to mistakenly claim there is or isn't consensus. Which itself is prone to abuse. On 6/10/2020 2:28 am, Brian Nisbet wrote: > All, > > I'm on leave from work this week and not checking this email a/c as > often as I normally would (or, hopefully, at all this week!), but I > wanted to pop in to clarify something. > > We do not vote on proposals in the RIPE community. We discuss them and > either consensus is reached or it is not. There is, therefore, no > calls for votes, nor counting of same. > > I would encourage everyone to read the material at > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies in order to gain a better > understanding of the process. > > Thanks, > > Brian > Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG > > Brian Nisbet > > Service Operations Manager > > HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network > > 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland > > +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie > > Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of PP > <phishphucker at storey.ovh> > *Sent:* Monday 5 October 2020 11:04 > *To:* anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > *Subject:* Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the > Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of > “abuse-mailbox”) > CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the > organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you > recognise the sender and know the content is safe. > > You don't know that it was "marginal" support, because no count was > ever conducted. > > > The Chair never asked for a "vote", and then when people didn't "vote" > (because they had never been asked to), they concluded (wrongly) that > there was no support for the proposal. > > > > > On 5/10/2020 8:51 pm, Alex de Joode wrote: >> Jordi, >> >> The proposal received a lot of push back. Your statement "some clear >> support for the policy during the discussion phase", is missing the >> word "marginal" between some and clear. >> >> I believe the Anti-Abuse WG Co-Chairs made the right call. Please >> consider retracting your appeal. >> >> >> -- >> IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl <mailto:alex at idgara.nl> | >> +31651108221 >> >> On Mon, 05-10-2020 10h 23min, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ >> <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> This appeal (attached in PDF) follows the process outlined by >> ripe-710 (RIPE PDP). >> >> >> Regards, >> Jordi >> @jordipalet >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.theipv6company.com >> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theipv6company.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca2a4a12e445d4c10fa4308d869160918%7Ccd9e8269dfb648e082538b7baf8d3391%7C0%7C0%7C637374890673962409&sdata=NQ%2FgJyz%2BpjWRO1Xh0PUGPmm7thiUh3jeEpAGLaYiRGw%3D&reserved=0> >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be >> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for >> the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further >> non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or >> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, >> including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be >> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended >> recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or >> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, >> including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be >> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original >> sender to inform about this communication and delete it. >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20201006/6d08a8e3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]