[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
PP
phishphucker at storey.ovh
Mon Oct 5 12:04:04 CEST 2020
You don't know that it was "marginal" support, because no count was ever conducted. The Chair never asked for a "vote", and then when people didn't "vote" (because they had never been asked to), they concluded (wrongly) that there was no support for the proposal. On 5/10/2020 8:51 pm, Alex de Joode wrote: > Jordi, > > The proposal received a lot of push back. Your statement "some clear > support for the policy during the discussion phase", is missing the > word "marginal" between some and clear. > > I believe the Anti-Abuse WG Co-Chairs made the right call. Please > consider retracting your appeal. > > > -- > IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl | +31651108221 > > On Mon, 05-10-2020 10h 23min, > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This appeal (attached in PDF) follows the process outlined by > ripe-710 (RIPE PDP). > > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for > the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further > non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use > of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a > criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents > of this information, even if partially, including attached files, > is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so > you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20201005/f062cad1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]