[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Thu Nov 12 18:06:55 CET 2020
Hi Tobias,
On Thu 12/Nov/2020 16:28:58 +0100 Tobias Knecht wrote:
>
> Please see the draft minutes from our Anti-Abuse Working Group Session in
> 127.0.0.1. Please let us know about any objections or necessary corrections asap.
Maybe it's me, but I cannot quite parse this sentence:
From his own work experience, he confirmed that abuse handling is
considered a security incident, there is a need for documentation
to be able to convince managers.
Perhaps "if abuse handling is to be considered a security matter..."?
Best
Ale
--
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]