[anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Siyuan Miao
siyuan at misaka.io
Sun May 10 15:56:40 CEST 2020
Elad, you **really** should stop spamming any mailing list and attacking people on Twitter. On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:53 PM bigpiggyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy--- via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hello IP Abuse Research, > > Response to your questions, misunderstanding and false information at: > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2020-May/005747.html > > ---- > "Please refrain from attacking mods or claiming censorship w/o proof, > provide logs or transparency into the issue or just state your case w/o > personal attacks." > ---- > Please refrain from writing false information to the readers, do you want > a proof of a censorship ? it sounds reasonable to you ? I need too use a > different email address in order to reply to you. > > > ---- > "Do you have a draft RFC or any buy in from the IETF for > your tracking packet proposal? Or is part of harnessing the power of the > RIPE part of a larger campaign to alter the current process? When > soliciting feedback, did any of the NIRs have pushback on this?" > ---- > The draft is in my head and will be implemented through a roundtable if I > will be elected. > > > ---- > "Do Cisco, Juniper, Huawei and others have an estimate on how long it will > take to develop the controls mentioned and integrate them / back port them? > Are they willing to subsidize this upgrade or will this require public and > private institutions around the world to update their BGP routers at their > own expense?" > ---- > No commercial company wil subsidize anything, the goal is that only > firmware updates will be needed without any hardware upgrade and that > through community pressure - through the roundtable - the routing equipment > manufaturers in the roundtable will do what they need to do (implementation > of their firmware according to the specfiications). > > > ---- > "If this works you might should follow up with Bert Hubert to > see if this solution can help fix the DNS Camel problem. I don't think he > has explored this specific means of control." > ---- > Bert is a member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus > Project" (such as you are) and he is taking active actions for me not to be > elected. He is against this solution because it came from me only because > of his ego. > > > ---- > "Both of your plans mention a large centralized infrastructure run by the 5 > RIRs which is managed "by regulated supervised Law Enforcement Agency (for > example: Interpol) and not by an internet organization such as the RIRs or > ccTLD registries." Is your proposal that we will create The Internet > Police? Will they be overseen by the UN or the ITU?" > ---- > This is incorrect, it is a "centralized" infrastructure exactly as the > root DNS servers are a "centralized" infrastructure - exactly the same and > everyone are happy with the root DNS servers spread over the world. > > Regarding: > "which is managed "by regulated supervised Law Enforcement Agency (for > example: Interpol) and not by an internet organization such as the RIRs or > ccTLD registries." > > This is a completele lie and you are intentioanlly taking sentences out of > their context! > > In the email spam solution, the only part of Interpol is to be in charge > only for setting which domains are criminal domains > (phishing/malware/virus/etc), remotely through an API, without any access > to the system - the reason that Interpol should set it and not the 5 RIR's > is because Interpol is regulated and supervised according to law and in > Interpol all the countries of the world is/should exist so Interpol will > not act as a political organization against any non-member country. The > reason Interpol is written and not Europol is also the same - so there will > not be any case of few countries in Europol against another country not in > the region of Europol (and capability of censorship, digital warfare, etc) > - so no politics will be involved here. And this criminals domains list > will not be used for agenda / politics / hidden interests (just like "The > Spamhaus Project" are doing anonymously). > > In the anti-abuse methods solutions, the only part of Interpol is > regarding creating the signed honeypot templates, that's it, without any > access to the system. The reason is that honeypot hacking will cause > criminal implications - so the honeypot template must be 100% reliable and > created by an organization which is supervised and is regulated according > to law - so there will not be false positives. > > > ---- > "When it comes to the > body of the 5 RIRs, are the NIRs represented independently or do they > maintain their own infrastructure?" > ---- > The two solutions will be managed only by the 5 RIR's, the bgp anycasted > infrastructure can be spread over internet organizations worldwide which > are not controlled by governments (and that these internet organizations > are in countries with strict privacy laws, without experience of violating > privacy laws and with democracies). > > Respectfully, > Elad > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200510/1e9c4781/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]