[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Jan 16 15:03:19 CET 2020
In message <[email protected]>, "=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Rocha?=" <sergio.rocha at makeitsimple.pt> wrote: >Agree, This anti-abuse list seems the blocking group to any anit-abuse >response measure. > >It's amazing that nobody cant propose anything without receiving a >shower of all sorts of arguments against Welcome to the Working Group. You must be new here. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]