[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Jan 16 11:44:08 CET 2020
In message <4be52277-cecb-603f-6840-4ee76245b0dd at first.org>, Serge Droz <serge.droz at first.org> wrote: >I think we already spent way more executive time on this thread than it >would cost us to verify e-mail addresses. I think that I may cut that out, print it in a 48-point type face, have it framed, and hang it on my office wall. :-) This is true even though I expressed some similar view on some similar situation here already some years ago. >And honestly: taking a step back and reading this entire thread, I'm not >surprised that the bad guys are winning. You know: They don't care about >the purty and beauty of a solution. They just do it and profit, and >probably have a fabulous time seeing us argue and go at each others >throats. I myself have certainly expressed this view previously, in private if not also in public. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]