[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Jan 15 19:55:16 CET 2020
> The policy proposal here is: if the registry doesn't comply, then it > is in explicit violation of RIPE policies. > > According to the "Closure of Members, Deregistration of Internet > Resources and Legacy Internet Resources" document (currently RIPE > 716), if you don't comply with RIPE policies or RIPE NCC procedures, > then the RIPE NCC is obliged to follow up with the resource holder and > if they continue not to comply, then the number resources will be > withdrawn. > > The purpose behind RIPE-716 is to ensure accurate registration of > number resources, which the core function of the RIPE registry. > > Jordi has confirmed that the intention behind 2019-04 is to force > resource holders to comply with the abuse handling procedures defined > in his policy, and that if they don't comply for whatever reason, that > their number resources are withdrawn under the terms of RIPE-716. > > To be clear, deregistration of resources would make it difficult or > impossible for almost any holder of addresses to continue their > business. > > So what's being proposed here is that RIPE-716 - whose purpose was to > ensure integrity and accuracy of the the RIPE registry - should now be > repurposed as a mechanism to enforce social behaviour practices on the > Internet. > > There are some pretty serious and fundamental problems with this. > > Many of these problems were discussed in the context of RIPE policy > 2019-03 ("Resource Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation"), and some of > them were formally addressed in the RIPE NCC review of that policy. exactly the ncc is supposed to be a registry, not a police force. enforcing proper quality registration is turning out to be hard and contentious enough in these days of ipv4 resource struggles. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]