[anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Jan 3 22:40:41 CET 2020
In message <20200103165918.GL72330 at Space.Net>, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 04:14:07PM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> So the RIR has absolutely no role in maintaining say IRR data? I agree >validating LOAs and such for routing changes would be on providers. Though >if the changes were to be made in IRR data who would validate it? > >IRR data is authenticated by registry data in RIPE land, if the resource >holder chooses so. Short story. > >So, nobody can create routes for, say, my address space unless I >authorize that. Yes. Nowadays, the RIPE IRR is better in this respect than any other IRR that I am aware of. Don't even get me started about RADB! They don't check anything, and there are stale entires in there from 10+ years go for routes to bogons. As far as I can tell, there is zero quality control and zero maintenance, the result being that it has become one big playground for routing crooks. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]