[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 16:39:35 CEST 2020
I can think of at least a dozen other such groups where most of the discussion is actually operational and on those topics. The only reason I find it useful to be on this wg is to look at abuse issues specific to the ripe region --srs ________________________________ From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:58:14 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> Cc: Sascha Luck [ml] <aawg at c4inet.net>; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote on 30/04/2020 14:07: > What would get discussed in an anti abuse wg? Carrots? Almost all the discussion in AAWG seems to be single-tracked on turning the RIPE NCC registry into a stick. E.g. industry standards / best practices, liaison with other anti-abuse groups, community engagement, measurement, etc. Nick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200430/1b702b83/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]