[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Thu Apr 30 09:51:36 CEST 2020
I do not disagree with this. Serge On 30.04.20 09:41, Hans-Martin Mosner wrote: > Am 30.04.20 um 02:58 schrieb Suresh Ramasubramanian: >> >> However, being in a fiduciary role - with IPv4 being traded like >> currency these days the description fits - RIPE NCC can’t not get >> involved. >> > ... >> NCC owes it to the rest of its membership and the internet community >> at large to take a more active role in this matter. >> > This. > > And as long as RIPE and/or NCC explicitly does not want to take action > when RIPE members don't handle abuse from their networks properly, the > whole issue of validating abuse mailbox addresses is moot. After all > discussion, the toothless compromise will be that there should be an > abuse mailbox, and FWIW it can be handled by Dave Null because nobody > will exert pressure on the resource holder to do anything else. > > Our problem on the receiving side of network abuse is not with the few > good-willing but technically challenged providers whose abuse mailbox > isn't working properly but with those large operators who don't give a > flying f about their customer's network abuse. > > Personally, I consider the anti-abuse WG a failure at this point. When I > joined I had hoped to see and possibly support constructive work towards > a reduction in network abuse, but apparently there are big players in > this game who are not interested in such a reduction as it would > undermine their "business". > > Cheers, > Hans-Martin > -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair of the FIRST Board of Directors https://www.first.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]