[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Wed Apr 29 13:44:42 CEST 2020
>> Coming from the incident response side, I'm tiered of people constantly >> telling me, that issues are not their problem > > How would this proposal help with said problem? > - It will catch the cases where some miss configuration happened indeed - It will make it impossible for orgs to say "We never received a report" - It allows us to enumerate better who does good work and who doesn't. And making this transparent will help showing thate there is an issue and maybe also be a motivation for people to change But I've said that before. Best Serge -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair of the FIRST Board of Directors https://www.first.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200429/ca466c05/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]