[anti-abuse-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 09:11:59 CEST 2020
Peace, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:43 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > The email he sent has been positively presidential in style I must say. For a specific value of president of course. With all due respect, I don't think this message belongs to even this WG as well (not even speaking of the iot-wg and mat-wg). In my opinion it is currently quite clear to everyone on the list that we have two people here: one, who doesn't seem to understand how e-mail works these days, and the other, who used to obtain IP prefixes in a direct violation of the process. Thanks for a heads-up, it was valuable, but I quite honestly don't think we really require *any* subsequent dialogue in this mailing list (not even speaking of the iot-wg and mat-wg) from the two. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]