[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Fri Apr 17 16:51:18 CEST 2020
On 17/04/2020 10:09, Tõnu Tammer via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > Dear friends, > > Every member of the community, who is on the receiving end of abuse, > feels that something should be done! > > I reiterate what I have said before: this is just one example of how > todays' approach in handling abuse or designing anti-abuse policy is not > really working. I am not the only one who has realised that this > community seems not to agree anything. That is perfectly understandable. > When once there was just academia who drove the development of internet, > now the community has grown encompassing legitimate business but also > abusers who have become part of that community. We can always find > reasons (justified or not) on why not to do anything or change anything > but we have to understand that impact of not doing anything will > continue to grow. > > Already number of countries argue rightly that the multi-stakeholder > approach is not working. And that is all too true. The reasons why they > want to change are likely not driven by the fact current approach is not > working but something more serious. We have to stop fuelling the > arguments that decentralised model is not delivering. If we continue as > we have, we will have changes forced upon us (thing we have turned down > so far) but its likely that more will come and things, we would not be > happy to see at all. > Tõnu nailed it. Print it and frame it. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]