[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Tue May 21 18:39:35 CEST 2019
Jordi, On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:31:24PM +0000, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > If you're acting in good faith you do not need the validation. So other people do not need to validate your abuse contact. > It just works. If you're acting in bad faith then additional validation will not change your behavior. You just check your > > ---->>> Right, but those folks *then* are violating the policy. the proposal does describe a compliance measurement. Gert's example is serving that by the letter and you claim "policy" is violated that way. Where exactly is the "policy" written down in 2019-04? -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]