[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 08:47:28AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> A case can be made that lax "not the internet police" policies that earlier allowed a single shady LIR to get multiple /14s and now, as per Furio, allows serial registration of  bogus LIRs to gather up IP space is actually making abuse and security teams worldwide expend rather more man hours than they would spend in a lifetime of engaging in this sort of occasional compliance.

You, again, fail to even *try* to make an argument on why this sort of
extra process would help in the least with the case you bring forward.

If someone is fraudulently heaping up LIRs but has a nicely responsive
abuse desk (and individual mails for each LIR) - how is "have all the
other LIRs do more work" going to help in this case?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190518/4a3f197d/attachment.sig>