[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Sat May 18 16:03:26 CEST 2019
On Sat, May 18, 2019, 3:44 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > If it weren't effectively property there wouldn't be firms listing large > blocks of v4 space as an asset while going out of business, and there > wouldn't be brokers specializing in acquiring and reselling this space. > If someone can sell something others may want to buy, it doesn't mean that what's being sold and bought is a property. There are people who are paying for some stars to have certain particular names in arbitrary private databases. "star-registration dot com" and such. IP addresses are essentially the very same thing. -- Töma > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190518/a2799347/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]