[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
furio ercolessi
furio+as at spin.it
Fri May 17 15:46:01 CEST 2019
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:24:51AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > [...] > It seems entirely possible for anybody at all to register a company and follow the paperwork > required to become a LIR and then allocate /14s at a time back in the day and maybe smaller > netblocks now to malicious actors. LIRs in the RIPE area are now limited to a single /22 ( https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-708#51 ), and as a consequence of this we are now seeing people creating multiple LIRs one after the other, each getting a single /22, and amassing a large of amount of v4 space with this simple trick. ARIN seems now to be going more aggressively than in the past after these guys ( https://krebsonsecurity.com/2019/05/a-tough-week-for-ip-address-scammers/ ). furio ercolessi
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]