[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri May 17 12:43:46 CEST 2019
On Fri, 17 May 2019, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:41:24AM +0100, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote: >> My team has nearly sent out 6000 abuse reports (only about intrusion >> attempts and brute force attacks) since Jan 1st this year. >> I've just checked, and only 2.5% bounced. 2018's bounces were around 4.5%. > > But this means the existing efforts from the RIPE NCC are showing an > effect, and we do *NOT NEED* a new policy with lots of extra complications. > > We do have abuse-mailbox verification, and we do have ARCs. > > Why do we need more process? Hi, We might not need more processes, but hopefully improved processes :-) Carlos > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]