[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:45:19AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> If two validations are done per year, I don't think this is
> significant overhead for any resource holder vs the benefits of the
> time saving for the same resource holders that need to use the abuse
> mailbox of a counterparty that today is escaping from a real
> validation and creating troubles with abuse emails to someone else.

Please do not speak for a LIR's abuse contact here.  These are 
(usually) good guys that have too much work and too little time to
actually *work on fixing abuse in their network*.

Your proposal steals life time from these guys, while not helping at
all with folks that just ignore mails sent to their (working and
verified!) abuse mail address.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190517/a791d792/attachment.sig>