[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 11:07:32 CET 2019
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 10:23 AM Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg < anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Do supporters need to specify which parts of the proposal's text are more > meaningful for them? > > Perhaps one of the Chairs can shed some light. > They in fact have done that before. To quote: ---- start ---- From: *Brian Nisbet* <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> Date: Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 10:12 AM Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation) [..] To clarify, the discussion on this proposal is a discussion, not a vote. When judging consensus the Co-Chairs will look at the points made during the discussion, not count the +1s. Of course it is useful to get a feeling for general agreement, so simple statements of support or dissent are very useful, but they are not the core of the thing. ---- end ---- -- Töma > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190330/f0dd6b64/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]