[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Mar 25 19:12:31 CET 2019
In message <20190325122413.GQ99066 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: >Unfortunately, RIPE and the NCC were founded in much more >cooperative days and so it was omitted to clearly define the >"limits of authority", perhaps because it was not seen as >necessary back then. I am pleased, at long last, to find that there is at least one thing that Sasha Luck and I agree on, and he has nicely summarized it above. >I therefore argue that it is maybe time to have a discussion on >what exactly RIPE and the NCC should be and what, if any, limits >on their administrative power there should be. Arguably, that has been the subtext of this discussion on 2019-03. >I hope, though, that everyone can at least agree that *this* is >*not* the forum for that discussion. On that point, we will have to continue to agree to disagree. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]