[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 00:18:10 CET 2019
Peace, On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 2:10 PM Carlos Friaças <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote: > I believe that's a matter of preference, but thank you, it's valuable > input for version 2.0 (which will probably be a lot longer and less prone > to be read by a larger set of people). > Alright. Just for the sake of simplicity, you may assume that my current reaction is "object". Having said that, I really appreciate your effort, support your initial intentions and am really looking forward to seeing the next revision right after the problem statement is clarified. -- Töma > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190325/92f1498c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]