[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Mar 21 09:35:19 CET 2019
It isn't a criminal offence, hence the need for some self-regulation at RIR (book-keeping and distribution) level. Carlos On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:04:53PM +0000, Carlos Friaas wrote: >>> I don't think that word means what you think it does. "criminal" >>> has a very precise legal meaning. If you think that advertisement >>> of numbers is a criminal act, please provide jurisdiction, act >>> and article under which it is. >> >> Three words: "dutch", "court", "order" -- that's jurisdiction over RIPE >> NCC. > > Please state, precisely under which Dutch law advertisement of > numbers not assigned to you is a criminal offence (Who knows, > there might be one...) > > rgds, > SL >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]