[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Mar 20 21:05:14 CET 2019
In message <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903201011190.23614 at noc.ilan.net.il>, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: >I view the criminals >as ones who analyze every RFC and every standard to determine where they >can be abused or manipulated for their benefit. A sanction that would be >implemented 18 months later would allow the evil LIR enough time to sell >their resources to some other LIR such that they would not lose such >resources. That's a good (and non-obvious) point! So, during any "review" process for any accused/alleged hijacker, the resources of that (alleged) hijacker must be frozen... with respect to transfers... until the matter has been adjudicated, one way or the other. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]