[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Clayton
richard at highwayman.com
Wed Mar 20 12:08:35 CET 2019
In message <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903192318300.2343 at gauntlet.corp.fccn.pt>, Carlos Friaças <cfriacas at fccn.pt> writes >The misuse of AS numbers was not seen (maybe until now...) as a frequent >event (and thus a priority), Then you have not been looking at various announcements of Chinese address space and asking yourself whether or not you think that it is plausible or not that a large Chinese ISP would be buying transit for a small subset of their space from this small out-of-region hosting company :-( >but if someone is (mis)using an AS number >that belongs to a third party, then it should also be stated in writing >that this practice is a violation of RIPE policy -- and of course, allow a >path for the affected party to issue a report about that. AIUI the current discussion is intended to allow the proposer to refine what they are proposing... ... in a world where RPKI is gaining some traction, the misuse of AS numbers (to tag onto hijacked prefixes) is going to become more common. I can see no reason to separate out this wickedness. -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]