[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Mar 20 09:36:06 CET 2019
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Hank Nussbacher wrote: (...) > I think we have different expections from criminals. I view the criminals as > ones who analyze every RFC and every standard to determine where they can be > abused or manipulated for their benefit. A sanction that would be > implemented 18 months later would allow the evil LIR enough time to sell > their resources to some other LIR such that they would not lose such > resources. > > -Hank Hi, Afaik, transfers are traceable. Not sure if they can be "reverted", but if LIR A transfers to LIR B, and if it is possible to establish that the same entity/org controls LIR A and LIR B, this should only be a matter of filing a report with all the details (referencing LIR A and B). Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]