[anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Mar 11 02:33:47 CET 2019
In message <EA68C6C9-B6F4-4B41-AF1E-FF63C174B164 at blacknight.com>, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote: >RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their accuser, >but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's problematic. >Personally I also find it very hard to engage in any meaningful debate with >"someone" if I have absolutely no idea who they are, who they represent or >what their agenda is. +1 I concur 100%. Moreover, I think it's not even a good use of bits to go around "casting aspersions" from behind a veil of secrecy. I confess that I myself hdo use and have used anonymous accounts on some platforms, but never for advocacy of anything where I had some hopes of people taking my words seriously. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Constructive Approach & Anonymity (Was RE: Verification of abuse contact addresses ? )
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]