[anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Tue Feb 19 13:23:12 CET 2019
I guess the subject is wrong :-) On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Thomas Hungenberg wrote: > FYI: Some longer-term statistics on this: > > Since January 2018, we have identified 157 invalid abuse contacts > (our abuse reports bounced) for network objects registered with > country code "DE" which we reported to RIPE NCC. > RIPE NCC reached out to their members responsible for the > respective objects. We sent out 2318 abuse reports this year (since 1st Jan 2019), and only 63 bounced. Not sure how many of these 63 are RIPE-related, but will have to investigate :-) > 150 cases have been solved by updating the abuse contact or correcting > the mail server configuration - usually within only a few days. > > There are only 2 cases older than four weeks still unresolved. That's excellent. Regarding the non-"DE" the figures are worse, right? Best Regards, Carlos > Thanks again to RIPE NCC for their great assistance! > > > - Thomas >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]