[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 15:42:35 CEST 2019
Is this despite RIPE operating a routing registry as a subset of the IRR and allowing ASNs to announce their routing policies? Despite RIPE allocating ASNs that are used in routing? On 17/04/19, 7:09 PM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Peter Koch" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of pk at DENIC.DE> wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 01:41:22PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: >> BGP hijacking completely negates the purpose of a (Regional Internet) Registry. >> >This is unclear to me. The Registry registers address space, not routes.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]