[anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Apr 15 03:49:03 CEST 2019
In message <rr9JsgDrv9scFAsh at highwayman.com>, Richard Clayton <richard at highwayman.com> wrote: >Hurricane Electric is seeing announcements from other ASs some of which >have AS65000 declared to be origin of the prefix I understand. The announcements are, in effect, mislabled. >Best practice is to remove internal use AS's from announcements -- not >much bad happens if you don't (well, you might not get as much >reachability if other folk are also using that reserved AS within their >networks...) Is anybody anywhere filtering out this kind of malarkey? >>The only other thing I feel compelled to say, or ask right now, is just >>this: Who should I be notifying if there is an issue with this ASN? > >the NOC for the people making the incorrect announcement Yes. And can you tell me who that is please? I'm asking for a bit of help here, because I'm out of my depth. But judging from the short bio sketch of you that I just now read on your personal web page, this would seem to be right up your alley. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Internet: AS65000
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]