[anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Doug Madory
douglas.madory at oracle.com
Sat Apr 13 14:55:00 CEST 2019
> Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly intentional. I believe what’s described in the Qrator article could be a leaking route optimizer (like Noction) not a new hijack type. Doug Madory Director of Internet Analysis, Oracle @internetintel Hanover, NH +1 603-676-5067 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190413/54a8d7cb/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190413/54a8d7cb/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Defining routing abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]