[anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] telia.lt: Ignoring abuse complaints (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Apr 6 22:10:59 CEST 2019
In message <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904060910530.21127 at gauntlet.corp.fccn.pt>, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Carlos_Fria=E7as?= <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote: >> I would say that this is just a very temporary mishap, and a temporary >> "fat fingered" anomaly if it were not for the fact that some of these >> routes have, according to RIPE Rotuing History, been countinuously >> announced for over four full months now. > >That's a bit long so that noone notices it... (and fixes it). Yes. >Thus, some filters >are not in place or they have a serious hole... :-( Can I request someone within the RIPE region to contact these people and try to see if they will respnd about this issue in a meaningful fashion? I already tried myself, but I just got back a response saying, in effect, "Yea. So? Why are you bothering us?" I guess that I have not been able to explain the problem to them very well. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Speaking of routing funny business... what's up with AS65021?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] telia.lt: Ignoring abuse complaints (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]